Toggle menu

Floral Fancy Panty

Product SKU: L20
(9 reviews) Write a Review
L-20- Blue Floral Panty
  • 100% Polyester Tricot Body; 65% Rayon/35% Polyester Absorbent Pad
  • Light to Moderate Absorbency, holds up to 5 oz of leakage
  • Brief Style Full Cut Panty
  • Latex Free Elastic Waist and Legs
  • Available in Blue Floral Print
Manufacturer Wearever

9 Reviews

  • 5
    comfortable panty

    Posted by sweetdevil614 on November 24, 2017

    I like that these panties look like ordinary panties so that I can still feel feminine while being protected from bladder leaks. This panty is very comfortable and the elastic doesn't cut or dig into my waist. I absolutely adore the soft blue floral print.

  • 5
    comfortable panty

    Posted by sweetdevil614 on November 21, 2017

    These are a very comfortable pair of panties. I made sure to follow the directions and wash them first. The elastic at the top of the panty didn't cut or dig into my sides and the panty was very absorbent. I love that they look like stylish regular panties. I am definitely ordering more.

  • 5
    These are wonderful panties!

    Posted by Miss Edie on December 21, 2016

    These are wonderful panties! I wear them under my compression pantyhose and my high-waist panty girdle. The light blue floral-print is so pretty! The fit is perfect! Most of all, I feel comfortable, fresh, and confident! Thank you Wearever!

  • 5

    Posted by Phy on October 26, 2016

    Love these. Run a little small for me but usable. I will order next pairs a size larger.

  • 5
    Great panty

    Posted by Tone on September 06, 2016

    Very nice panty very comfortable wide gusset I wear these under my slacks when I go out my wife also loves the floral print even wearing a thick pad with panty can't even notice Great job weaver.

  • 5
    I really love them!

    Posted by smilie on May 16, 2016

    I am so glad to be associated with wearever panties! Using them for the past two years . They are stylish , comfortable and durable- stand 250 washes really! . Above all, they save me from embarrassments. I always wear them and go out without a worry about the light incontinence . I really love them. Thank you wearever for introducing this wonder product !

  • 5
    These are a good solution to light incontinence

    Posted by Gary on April 14, 2016

    I bought several pairs of these, and found them to be the solution I needed to eliminate the daily pads. The width and length of the gusset in these, are good enough to say that these are great unisex underwear. The gusset is wider and longer than any disposable pads, yet not bulky.
    If it were ever necessary, one could add a pad to the inside of these, and gain even more security, as the gusset is so much wider than any commercial incontinence pad, that any spill over would be caught by the sewn in gusset. And if this is so, than one could say that this underwear would last even longer than the claimed 250 washes, with added pads if ever necessary. Males would probably want to order one size smaller, in order to keep the fabric compression tight.
    Also note that the fabric is polyester, and not nylon, however it feels very durable. Quality of construction is excellent as if made in the USA. Product is made in Honduras, but as with most Prime Fibers products, the quality is A+.

  • 4
    Floral Fancy Absorbent Panties

    Posted by Drumr48 on January 07, 2014

    Just received my order of several different styles and the Floral Fancy Absorbent Panties are one of my favorites for lighter absorbency. They are soft and silky and feel like wearing regular silky brief panties. Comfort, pretty feminine style, combined with protection for lighter leakage. I am male and recommend these panties for male and female. I ordered size small in all styles for a snug fit. Hope they will make them in pink in the near future!

  • 5
    These are my favorite panties.

    Posted by Rachael on December 22, 2011

    These look and wear just like regular panties and are very comfortable. Good protection against most minor mistakes.